Covering the digital giants, by Jon Fortt
Type Size  -  +
June 4, 2008, 4:38 pm

Why Moto won’t get its man

Todd Bradley heads HP’s $36 billion PC group, and Motorola has courted him to run its cell phone division. Image: HP

If anyone can rescue Motorola’s phone business, it’s Hewlett-Packard’s Todd Bradley. The question is why he’d want to.

Sure, Bradley likes fixer-uppers like this one. During stints at Gateway, Palm (PALM) and Hewlett-Packard (HPQ), he has burnished his high-tech management cred by building good products for less money than the competition. He’s not a visionary who dreams up flashy stuff – he’s a hard-hat guy who gets things done on time and under budget.

That makes Bradley, currently the executive vice president of HP’s PC group, an ideal choice to revive the flailing phone business that Motorola plans to spin off. (The Wall Street Journal reported that Bradley is Motorola’s top pick for mobile CEO.) Moto’s disjointed leadership team and mangled manufacturing process are the kinds of challenges Bradley has tackled before. At the helm of Palm, Bradley ran such a tight ship that he beat Handspring in the handheld computer business and forced Sony (SNE) to drop out. At HP he has done much of the same, cutting costs and boosting profits so that the creative teams have room to try new things.

But I still can’t imagine Bradley really wants this Motorola (MOT) job. After joining HP in early 2005 he spent months shaking up the leadership team, weeding out supply chain problems and simplifying laptop designs so HP can respond more quickly to changes in customer tastes. When I chatted with him a month ago about his progress at HP, Bradley didn’t sound like someone whose work was done. He sounded like a mechanic eager to see how much faster his tuned up car can go.

To make that happen, Bradley’s putting more energy into HP’s distribution partnerships, amping up design to take on Apple (AAPL), and getting HP PCs in front of new customers all over the world. “Three years ago we clearly didn’t have a marketing capability. Clearly our design was not where it should be,” he told me, noting that the company has made great strides in those areas. “Now we’re looking at our market coverage. We’ve expanded from 20 cities in China to 700. You’ve got Vietnam. But you’ve also got 20 percent of the United States not covered, and by any stretch of the imagination that’s a lot of people.”

Sure, if Bradley were to take the Motorola job and ace it, he might go down among the finest tech turnaround artists ever. But he would also have to leave a resurgent HP and deal with Moto’s conflicted board of directors, its pitchfork-wielding shareholders, and the headaches involved in the handset division spin-off.

That’s a lot of politics and bureaucracy for a guy who thrives on down-and-dirty management, and hates shaking hands and making speeches. And that’s why, for my money, Todd Bradley’s not going anywhere.

I don’t know ehere you got that idea. Sony was a big driver in improving the Palm OS.

In June 2004, “Sony has divulged that they will not be releasing any new Clie Handhelds products in the coming fall. Sony will be suspending new Clie product development for the US while they reassess the direction of the conventional PDA market.” The rest of the article is on http://www.palminfocenter.com/view_story.asp?ID=6866

Posted By Rex, San Jose : June 13, 2008 9:59 am

Palm did not force Sony of the market for PDA’s. The handwriting is on the wall — the PDA market is shrinking and is on the path to oblivion. Sony realized this and exited a contracting market. Are there still standalone PDA devices in the US? You can almost say that Palm forced themselves to drop out.

From Jon Fortt: Back when Sony got out, the handheld market wasn’t the disaster it is today. Sony had been trying to establish itself as a provider of stylish devices, but Palm just squeezed too hard on the margins. Sony couldn’t maintain market share, and reluctantly bowed out.

Posted By Rex, San Jose CA : June 5, 2008 10:33 am
CNNMoney.com Comment Policy: CNNMoney.com encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNNMoney.com may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNNMoney.com the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNNMoney.com Privacy Statement.
Jon ForttA senior writer for Fortune, Jon Fortt focuses on technology and innovation in Silicon Valley - a subject he's been reporting on since his days as a rookie reporter for the Lexington (Ky.) Herald-Leader. Before joining Fortune in 2007, Jon had reporting and editing stints at Business 2.0 magazine, and the San Jose (Calif.) Mercury News, Silicon Valley's hometown newspaper.
Subscribe to Big Tech: RSS feed | email newsletter
* : Time reflects local markets trading time.† - Intraday data delayed 15 minutes for Nasdaq, and 20 minutes for other exchanges.• Disclaimer
Powered by WordPress.com.