Covering the digital giants, by Jon Fortt
Type Size  -  +
January 16, 2008, 3:55 pm

Why Oracle sweetened its bid for BEA

Larry Ellison bullied and bluffed. But in the end, this software value meal proved too good to pass up.

A little more than a decade ago, fast-food giants realized they could get people to spend more by bundling burgers, fries and a drink together in a value meal.

Larry Ellison
Oracle CEO Larry Ellison finally got BEA — and another big opportunity to upsell corporate customers. Image: Oracle

More from Big Tech

How did Apple do? A Macworld 2008 report card

Flash storage and more in HP’s redesigned laptops (Photos 1/6)

HP’s new Blackbird: The Lexus of PCs? (Photos 1/6)

Today’s business software giants are catching on to the same thing. And that, more than anything, explains Oracle’s (ORCL) willingness to pay $8.5 billion for BEA Systems (BEAS) in what would be the third-largest software deal ever.

To understand what BEA brings to the table, let’s take the menu metaphor a little further. Oracle, helmed by deal making CEO Larry Ellison, already sells the industry’s most popular database. And with purchases like PeopleSoft and Siebel, Oracle has been beefing up its selection of applications businesses use to manage employee performance, business expenses, and other functions.

But to entice customers to do all their software shopping with Oracle, Ellison needs to create a full value meal. To achieve that, Oracle needs more of what BEA has.

“For Oracle, this deal is a very big step toward completing our vision of becoming a strategic enterprise software vendor of choice for our customers,” Ellison said. “We’ve demonstrated over many acquisitions that we’ve made the past three years how expanding like this benefits both our customers and our shareholders.”

The benefit that BEA brings Oracle is middleware. Middleware is the secret sauce that helps the jumble of corporate software programs work together, for example allowing a customer service system to access information from the billing program. In the age of the Internet, that kind of linkage is key as companies seek to build time-saving online experiences for their customers and employees.

Yes, Oracle has its own Fusion middleware — but BEA has a valuable base of customers, many of whom don’t already order most of their software from the Oracle menu. If Ellison can hold onto those customers while absorbing BEA and cutting costs, he can then upsell them into Oracle’s many other software offerings.

“Oracle is making a very profound statement here,” said John Senor, president of iWay Software, which does business with both Oracle and BEA. “By acquiring an independent with the installed base and reputation of BEA, Oracle is showing themselves to be very serious about being a large-scale enterprise infrastructure vendor. This is a very significant challenge to IBM (IBM), Microsoft (MSFT) and even SAP (SAP).”

It’s also the logical next step in a process Ellison has been talking about since the dot-com bust. Though he incorrectly predicted that Silicon Valley wouldn’t see another boom anytime soon — companies like Google (GOOG) and VMWare (VMW) have proven that the geeks still have plenty of fight left — Ellison was dead-on when he foretold the consolidation trend in enterprise software.

Business customers, Ellison has said, won’t want to visit dozens of different customers to cobble together their technology infrastructure. They’ll want one-stop shopping. Which means it’s time for the big guys to swallow the little guys.

With that air of bravado, Oracle has spent more than $25 billion over the last three years before bullying and bluffing its way into a $17 per share offer for BEA in October, which BEA management immediately dismissed as insultingly low. Ellison scoffed at BEA’s rejection, pretending he wouldn’t pay a penny more — he even said that after further studying BEA’s business, Oracle realized its initial $6.7 billion offer had been too high.

It was all bluster. Despite pressure from activist investor Carl Icahn, BEA CEO Alfred Chuang held out for more money. Good thing, too — though BEA’s board didn’t get the $21 per share it wanted, it got Ellison to sweeten the deal considerably. Oracle will pay $19.375 in cash, which is more than Wall Street seemed to think BEA would fetch even when investors assumed BEA would sell. Back in October at the height of Oracle buyout fever, the highest BEA traded was $18.94.

So now that Oracle has bagged BEA, what’s next for the rock-em, sock-em middleware market? In a recent research note, Jefferies & Co. analyst Katherine Egbert suggested that the big players might be circling Tibco Software (TIBX), the last big middleware player that hasn’t been snatched up.

Investors seem to agree that Tibco will soon be the side order in someone’s value meal. Tibco is relatively small pickings with a market cap under $1.5 billion, but it’s getting pricier by the minute: the stock climbed 11 percent on the news of BEA’s tie-up with Oracle, as investors speculated that a big player — maybe Hewlett-Packard (HPQ), IBM or Microsoft — will soon buy Tibco, too.

It’s interesting to see how companies evolve and prosper.

http://www.zpryme.com

Posted By N.Walter, Austin, TX : January 30, 2008 4:17 pm

Well Oracle now has the #1 DB, the #1 (BEA) AND #3 (Oracle Fusion) Middleware offering, and the #2 Applications offering(s) (Oracle E-business Suite, PeopleSoft, JDE, Siebel et cetera). They will get the integration details hammered out sooner then later, and likely sooner then their competition since they own all these companies now. This company is the next big Technology Juggernaut, no doubt.

SAP, see ya later…Microsoft and IBM, move over.

Posted By Brian, Boulder, CO : January 21, 2008 10:21 pm

And Oracle has already started bugging the devil out of me on their fusion middleware offerings. The problem with Oracle’s hyper-drive acquisitios is that they doa very bad job of integration. Most of their bundled solutions are kluges. We’ve tried several and have had to abandon them all for other soluitons. The World doesn’t need another Microsoft to suck up market share and then offer poorly designed, expensive solutions. Oracle has only done one this well in its entire history: they have a rock solid database. Larry Ellison is an ego maniac, who will be the end or Oracle one day. Sure Sun bought MySQL, but it cannot do the heavy-lifting that Oracle, Sybase and DB2 do quite will.

Posted By IT manager, NY : January 21, 2008 12:55 pm

Ellison was wrong about no more Silicon Valley booms??? He was right in every detail. Two big IPOs in six years = nuclear winter.

Even better, the conventional wisdom at the time said “We’ll bounce back in 2003!!”

From Jon Fortt: You can’t forget about startup acquisitions, though. There have been a ton of those. And it’s hard to argue that Web 2.0 and SAAS aren’t providing a mini-boom out here in Silicon Valley. (Ellison backed Netsuite himself, which says something.)

Posted By Chris, Tampa FL : January 18, 2008 2:05 pm

Oracle purchased the wrong company. The Sun-MySQL combo is far more compelling. Sun purchased the future, Oracle purchased the past.

Posted By The VAR Guy, Centerport, NY : January 17, 2008 8:07 pm
CNNMoney.com Comment Policy: CNNMoney.com encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNNMoney.com may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNNMoney.com the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNNMoney.com Privacy Statement.
Jon ForttA senior writer for Fortune, Jon Fortt focuses on technology and innovation in Silicon Valley - a subject he's been reporting on since his days as a rookie reporter for the Lexington (Ky.) Herald-Leader. Before joining Fortune in 2007, Jon had reporting and editing stints at Business 2.0 magazine, and the San Jose (Calif.) Mercury News, Silicon Valley's hometown newspaper.
Subscribe to Big Tech: RSS feed | email newsletter
* : Time reflects local markets trading time.† - Intraday data delayed 15 minutes for Nasdaq, and 20 minutes for other exchanges.• Disclaimer
Powered by WordPress.com.