Covering the digital giants, by Jon Fortt
Type Size  -  +
October 3, 2007, 11:46 am

Apple revamps a bestseller list, making iPhone sales harder to track

Apple store top sellersThe Apple (AAPL) Store has revamped the way it lists the top-selling online items, making it more difficult to tell whether iPhones are more popular than iPods or Macs.

Up until the past few days, Apple displayed one list of the top-selling items across all of its product categories at store.apple.com. That list tended to show that the iPod nano was the company’s best-selling single item, followed by the iPod classic and iPod touch. The MacBook laptop typically showed up in fourth or fifth place, with the iPhone nearby.

With Apple’s new listing system, it separates products by category. All computer-related items are listed together, then all iPod-related items, and all iPhone-related items.

The effect, intended or not, is that it is more difficult to tell how much last month’s iPhone price cut is moving the needle on sales. (Apple sells a healthy proportion of its product through its popular online store, which made it a decent barometer of a product’s overall appeal.)

Apple’s new listing method does offer good news for Apple investors, however: Early signs indicate that Apple’s new iPod product lineup will yield healthy profit margins. The second-best-selling iPod today, behind the nano, is the new flash memory-based iPod touch, which starts at $299. The iPod classic, which has more storage and a lower price tag, is number three. Amazon.com’s (AMZN) electronics top-seller list shows the same trend; on its list the nano is the most popular iPod, followed by one version of the classic and two versions of the touch.

Generally speaking, better sales of higher-priced iPods suggest higher profit margins.

I agree. When I took statistics in college, the one thing I learned is that you can make anything look the way you want it to, as long as you have control over the data.

Posted By BW : March 26, 2008 10:27 pm

Careful, Bill … reporting skills aside I bet Jon could easily kick your ass.
Would be nice if reporters can challenge each other and step in a UFC style ring… I would pay to see Daniel Eran beat Ron Enderle’s butt

Posted By Bobobobobobob, LV, NV : October 3, 2007 4:09 pm

Careful, Bill … reporting skills aside I bet Jon could easily kick your ass.

Posted By Scott King, Falls Church VA : October 3, 2007 1:02 pm

I’m not impressed by a guy that is supposed to report on Apple, saying the only way he has to track sales is go to Apples website and click on the rating list. If THAT’S all you do for me, forget it. I can do that myself.

You wanna be a reporter?
Go out and gather data and report on it.

Posted By Bill Brasington, Dresher PA : October 3, 2007 12:14 pm
CNNMoney.com Comment Policy: CNNMoney.com encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNNMoney.com may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNNMoney.com the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNNMoney.com Privacy Statement.
Jon ForttA senior writer for Fortune, Jon Fortt focuses on technology and innovation in Silicon Valley - a subject he's been reporting on since his days as a rookie reporter for the Lexington (Ky.) Herald-Leader. Before joining Fortune in 2007, Jon had reporting and editing stints at Business 2.0 magazine, and the San Jose (Calif.) Mercury News, Silicon Valley's hometown newspaper.
Subscribe to Big Tech: RSS feed | email newsletter
* : Time reflects local markets trading time.† - Intraday data delayed 15 minutes for Nasdaq, and 20 minutes for other exchanges.• Disclaimer
Powered by WordPress.com.